In partnership with

Disparity in Agent Splits Revealed by Regional Analysis

Introduction

In the ever-evolving landscape of real estate, agent commission splits have garnered increased attention, particularly in the Northeast. Recent analysis from industry reports and surveys reveals how commission structures vary significantly by region, highlighting the unique challenges faced by real estate professionals.

Regional Disparities

Northeast vs. Midwest
For agents in the Northeast, the disparity in commission splits is notably pronounced. Data shows that approximately 32 percent of respondents from this region reported a commission split of 70 percent or more, in stark contrast to only 13 percent in the Midwest. This discrepancy underscores the need for agents and brokers to reassess their market positioning to remain competitive, especially as clients become more discerning about value.

Inventory Challenges

A report by Inman detailing internal inventory challenges reveals that 56 percent of agents in the Northeast experienced issues related to inventory levels, compared to 43 percent in the Midwest. This struggle to maintain adequate inventory affects commission negotiations, prompting agents to adapt their strategies in an increasingly competitive environment. For instance, some agents have started leveraging virtual tours and advanced marketing techniques to attract buyers despite low inventory.

Regional Breakdown of Housing Inventory Challenges

Northeast

The Northeast region is experiencing some of the most severe inventory shortages:

• Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York saw significant decreases in housing inventory from Q1 2023 to Q1 2024, with declines of 16.6%, 15.2%, and 12.0% respectively.

• Massachusetts and Pennsylvania also experienced inventory decreases, though less severe at 3.8% and 3.1%.

• Maine and Vermont were bright spots in the region, with inventory increases of 26.4% and 15.2% respectively.

South

The Southern region shows a mixed picture:

• Florida led the nation with a 34.7% increase in housing inventory.

• Other states with significant inventory growth include Mississippi (17.2%), Texas (16.0%), Louisiana (15.9%), and Alabama (14.0%).

• However, Georgia saw a 7.5% decrease in inventory.

Midwest

The Midwest region generally saw modest improvements in inventory:

• South Dakota and Minnesota led the region with inventory increases of 21.0% and 15.9% respectively.

• Missouri also saw a significant increase of 13.3%.

• Illinois, however, experienced a substantial decrease of 13.0%.

West

The Western region faced some of the most challenging inventory situations:

• Nevada and Idaho saw the largest inventory decreases nationwide at 19.2% and 18.7% respectively.

• California, despite its size and influence on the national market, experienced a slight decrease of 1.7%.

• Colorado was a bright spot in the region with a 15.0% increase in inventory.

Factors Contributing to Regional Variations

1. Population and job growth: Areas experiencing rapid population growth, such as Florida and Texas, are seeing increased housing demand and responding with inventory growth.

2. Construction activity: Regions able to overcome labor shortages and supply chain issues are better positioned to increase inventory.

3. Local regulations: Strict land use regulations in some areas, particularly in the Northeast and West Coast, can limit new development and exacerbate inventory shortages.

4. Climate and natural disasters: Some regions, like Florida, may be seeing inventory increases partly due to migration patterns influenced by climate concerns.

5. Economic factors: Local economic conditions, including job markets and income levels, can influence both demand for housing and the ability to construct new homes.

National Trends

Commission Structure Variations
National findings indicate that agent splits are not uniform. In the West, where 51 percent of agents reported a preference for a specific commission share, both clients and agents benefit from heightened transparency regarding commission structures. While 25 percent of agents in the West have experienced significant changes in commission splits over the past year, only 10 percent in the Northeast have reported similar experiences. This suggests a regional variation in how commission structures are evolving.

Shifting Compensation Models

The analysis also highlights a concerning trend: a growing number of agents are considering alternative compensation models, reflecting a shift in consumer expectations. In the Northeastern market, where seller satisfaction metrics are crucial, agents may benefit from exploring innovative structures such as flat-fee listings or performance-based bonuses to enhance client relationships and secure future business opportunities.

Conclusion

In conclusion, as disparities in agent splits continue to shape the real estate landscape, the industry must strive toward greater equity and adaptability. How will agents evolve their strategies to meet these unprecedented challenges?

Other sources:

The Real Estate Professional’s Secret Weapon - Land id™

Discover extensive nationwide private parcel data, create & showcase powerful, shareable, interactive maps of any property: Fast, Easy and Mobile, with Land id™.

With the brand new streamlined Property Info Cards, Land id™ brings industry leading data and contextual layers to the forefront in a single tap or swipe.

Try Free For 7 Days Today